Search Results

< Back < Previous | Next > Digital Trade Data flows in supply chains: Practical realities and policy implications 11 Jun 2025 Cross-border data flows are essential for efficient global supply chains, enabling real-time coordination and logistics across borders. ICC provides concrete recommendations to align policies with operational realities and keep trade flowing. Why are cross-border data flows essential to modern supply chains? Cross-border data flows are essential for efficient, resilient, and interconnected global supply chains. They enable real-time coordination, including traceability, custom clearance and the deployment of digital tools such as IoT and AI-driven analytics. Restrictive data policies, however, can create significant barriers that disrupt these interconnected systems. Such restrictions slow down trade, increase operational costs, and disproportionately impact MSMEs – the backbone of global economies – who may be excluded from global markets due to complex, costly compliance requirements. What’s stopping data from moving freely? Despite their critical role, cross-border data flows face growing regulatory hurdles. The lack of multilateral coordination and a fragmented regulatory landscape create barriers to trade and disrupt supply chains. Key issues range from data localisation mandates – which require companies to store and process data within national borders – to conflicting privacy and cybersecurity rules which increase compliance burdens. These fragmented regulatory approaches create uncertainty and act as non-tariff barriers to trade. They create inefficiencies, limit business opportunities and undermine the ability of companies to optimize supply chain operations, international scalability and competitiveness. ICC recommendations: what can policymakers do to fix it? Pursue new rules at the WTO to enable trusted, secure, and predictable cross-border data flows. Promote risk-based approaches that differentiate between personal and non-personal data. Ensure interoperable data standards and avoid blanket localisation requirements that require all data, regardless of type, to be stored locally. Protect Confidential Business Information (CBI) in trade and data policies. Invest in MSME-friendly digital trade ecosystems, including trusted trader programmes. Download

< Back < Previous | Next > Business takeaways from the first rounds of UN Tax Framework Convention negotiations Luisa Scarcella (Global Policy Lead – Taxation and Trade) 20 Aug 2025 ICC is advocating for predictable, stable global tax rules to support cross-border trade and investment at the first rounds of United Nations Tax Framework Convention talks. Taxpayer rights, rigorous economic analysis, clarity on new instruments and effective dispute prevention and resolution were championed as key priorities for business. What’s the UN Tax Framework Convention and why does it matter for business? The negotiations for a United Nations Framework Convention on International Tax Cooperation could redefine the foundations of international taxation, which naturally carry implications for business. Predictable and economically sound tax rules are essential for cross-border trade and investment. As the institutional representative of businesses worldwide and a Permanent Observer to the United Nations, ICC is engaging throughout this process by advocating for a system that delivers the stability businesses need to drive growth and sustainable development. Who is steering the talks and what’s the roadmap? The Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee (INC) is leading this process. The negotiations build on long-standing advocacy efforts from developing countries and the commitments in the 2015 Addis Ababa Action Agenda, which called for inclusive decision-making in international tax advocacy and to increase the mobilisation of resources towards the 2030 Agenda. In early 2024, an ad hoc UN committee negotiated the Terms of Reference for the process, setting out its scope, objectives and timeline.Crucially, the TOR included the decision of having two early protocols that would be developed in parallel with the Framework Convention itself. Negotiations are scheduled to run from 2025 to 2027, with the final text — including both protocols — expected to be presented to the UN General Assembly by autumn 2027. The Framework Convention will establish broad principles and mechanisms for international tax cooperation, while the protocols will deal specifically with cross-border taxation of services (drawing on provisions from Articles 12A, 12B, and 12AA of UN model conventions) and on tax dispute prevention and resolution. In August 2025, the first two substantive sessions of negotiations took place, following the release of issue notes on the Framework Convention, the two early protocols, as well as a public consultation to which the ICC provided the following submissions: ICC response to issue notes on the Framework Convention ICC response to cross-border taxation of services early protocol ICC response to tax dispute prevention and resolution earlyprotocol Week 1 discussions Week one in New York focused on the initial commitments to be included in the Framework Convention: the fair allocation of taxing rights, dispute prevention and resolution and sustainable development as well as the need for administrative cooperation. Most countries expressed a preference for high-level commitments, while some voiced a preference for first agreeing on the underlying principles. Key design questions still remain, including whether the new system will function as a Multilateral Instrument (akin to the OECD MLI) or more like the recent Fast-Track instrument designed by the UN Tax Committee of Experts. Work continues through member-country only meetings. Week 2 discussions Week two turned to the early protocols. Protocol on Cross-Border Taxation of Services : discussions centered around gross and net basis withholding taxes, nexus rules that do not require physical presence, data needs to verify service provision and dispute resolution. References have also been made to the recently adopted Article 12AA of the UN Model – which substantially change the way cross-border services are taxed, prescribing gross-basis taxation without any physical presence required – as well as Digital Services Taxes and similar measures adopted in some countries such as France, Nigeria and Colombia. Protocol on Tax Dispute Prevention and Resolution : conversations focused on current gaps in mechanisms. Open issues included scope – whether the protocol is limited to Framework Convention related disputes or all cross-border tax disputes – how to resolve cases where no treaty exists and whether to include tax arbitration. ICC advocacy priorities Inclusion of taxpayers rights among the principles of the Framework Convention to ensure tax certainty alongside the right to be heard, the right to fair treatment and the right to confidentiality, among others. Importance of economic analysis to verify that any solutions can truly be effective and not represent a barrier to trade and investment, such as gross-basis withholding taxes Tax policy should foster cross-border trade and investment that creates jobs and sustainable economic growth, not act as a barrier. Clarity over the relationship with current tax treaties and other multilateral solutions. The importance of dispute prevention (through, for example, cooperative compliance and advance pricing agreements) and ensuring that effective and efficient mechanisms are in place when disputes do arise (e.g. binding arbitration). Continuous dialogue between governments and businesses , which can share practical experience and insights. Learn more or help shape the ICC perspective at the UN Tax Framework Convention ICC will be participating in the next negotiation session on 10-21 November 2025 in Nairobi, Kenya. For further information on the negotiations, potential business impacts and how to get involved with the work of the ICC Global Tax Commission, please contact Luisa Scarcella (Global Policy Lead – Taxation and Trade) at Luisa.SCARCELLA@iccwbo.org and Vidusshi Singh (Policy Advisor – Banking and Tax) at Vidusshi.SINGH@iccwbo.org .

< Back < Previous | Next > Marketing Trust as the through-line: inside the Global Marketing and Advertising Commission’s London meeting 6 May 2026 ICC Global Marketing and Advertising Commission — 28 April 2026, London Trust as the through-line: inside the Global Marketing and Advertising Commission’s London meeting ICC Global Marketing and Advertising Commission — 28 April 2026, London When Alice Himsworth, Chair of the ICC Global Marketing and Advertising Commission, opened proceedings in London on 28 April, she pointed to a single thread running through an otherwise ambitious agenda: trust. Hosted in hybrid format at Google’s Central Saint Giles offices, the meeting drew members from across the globe to debate how the industry maintains, and rebuilds, public confidence at a moment of unusually rapid transformation. By the close of the afternoon, that thread had been pulled through every workstream, every keynote and every regulatory update on the table. Setting the str ategic stage Raelene Martin, ICC’s Head of Sustainability for Global Policy, set the scene by mapping the Commission’s work onto wider ICC priorities for 2026. She underlined how marketing and advertising expertise increasingly intersects with trade, digital governance, sustainability and consumer protection. Of particular note was the synergy emerging around scams, fraud and organised crime, building on the Digital Economy Commission’s recent paper and ICC’s contribution to the UN Global Fraud Summit. Environmental communications, she added, are now being referenced well beyond this Commission, including in preparations for COP in Antalya later in the year. The Commission also took a moment to honour Anders Stephens, who has formally stepped down as co-chair of the Code Revision Task Force. As Anders himself put it with characteristic humour, code revision is not for the faint-hearted — but the work he has shaped over four decades remains foundational. The trust dividend Stephen Woodford, Chief Executive of the UK’s Advertising Association, then delivered a keynote that gave members both data and direction. While trust in most institutions continues to slide, trust in advertising in the UK has risen from 31% to 40% over recent years. Mr Woodford framed the value of trust under three headings: results, regulation and recruitment. Drawing on the IPA’s databank of effectiveness cases, he showed that trust has climbed from seventh to second place among drivers of commercial success, and that campaigns associated with high trust outperform peers by roughly 30 percentage points on large business effects. MPs who do not trust the industry are five times more likely to want to legislate. And young talent, unsurprisingly, will not join an industry their friends consider untrustworthy. The drivers of trust, Mr Woodford explained, sit on a roughly 50/50 balance sheet. On the positive side, enjoyment accounts for around 30% and social contribution for 15%. On the negative, “bombardment” — particularly intrusion and repetition — leads, followed by “suspicious advertising”, inside which the share attributed to scams has tripled since 2018. Crypto fraud, data privacy concerns and worries about advertising in high-risk categories complete the picture. The single most strongly correlated factor behind the UK’s trust uplift is awareness of the ASA’s public-facing campaign: among those who recall the ads, trust in advertising stands at 70%, compared with around 30% for those who do not. Policy in motion The Commission then turned to its live workstreams. Oliver Gray reported that the Revision of the ICC Framework for Responsible Alcohol Marketing Communications is approaching its third draft, with definitions for alcohol-free brand extensions clarified, references to relevant global best practice incorporated, and a strengthened article on influencer marketing. WFA and IARD confirmed the latest compromise text was close to consensus, with one outstanding issue — the definition of “non-alcohol” — to be resolved in light of widely varying national rules. The Revision of the ICC Framework for Responsible Food and Beverage Marketing Communications is now beginning, drawing structurally on the alcohol framework and aligning fully with the revised ICC Code. Children, teens and HFSS communications will sit at the heart of the work, and members were invited to step forward as drafters. Alice Himsworth, leading the new policy product on scams in advertising, reported strong member engagement and important feedback from the Global Advertising Scams Alliance, ICC Belgium and others. Scoping remains the central question: financial fraud is the most acute manifestation, but phishing, identity harvesting and the wider scam journey all bear on consumer trust. The paper’s structure will privilege flexibility over a rigid responsibility map, with annexes potentially used to illustrate the multi-actor pathway. Publication has been pushed beyond June to allow further consultation. Adam Ingle of LEGO presented an early concept note attached to the Revision of the ICC Toolkit on Marketing and Advertising to Children, alongside a new policy paper on responsible marketing to children and teens. Forty-two countries are now considering social-media restrictions for under-16s. His proposal would seek consensus across platforms on common design features — pushing back against infinite scroll, push notifications and other engagement mechanisms — when marketing material is likely to reach children. The intention is not to oppose regulation but to preserve constructive digital spaces for younger users. Alex Krasodomski closed the policy round by inviting members to amplify the recently published Responsible AI in Marketing: how to apply the ICC Code. A podcast episode is in production, and the team is exploring speaking opportunities at events such as the AI for Good Summit in Geneva. Self-regulation under pressure, and ready to lead A fireside chat between Guy Parker, Chief Executive of the ASA, and Emma Bennett, Chief of Staff of ICC UK, gave members a candid view from the regulator’s chair. Pressure points are well known: scams, misleading advertising, AI, gambling and influencer disclosure. Compliance with influencer labelling has risen to around 60% in the UK — better, but, as Mr Parker put it, a “could-do-better school report”. The ad ethics programme, with around 10,000 influencers trained across Europe, is part of the answer; so too is the forthcoming Intermediary and Platform Principles initiative, formalising platforms’ role in upstream prevention. With Amazon already at $80 billion in advertising revenues and OpenAI publicly targeting $100 billion by 2030, the case for keeping new entrants inside the self-regulatory tent is only strengthening. Looking outward Looking ahead, the Commission previewed several headline initiatives: ICC’s first formal presence at Cannes Lions 2026 through a dedicated Self-Regulation Day, in partnership with ICAS, EASA, ARPP and GALA; the imminent launch of the first-ever Portuguese version of the ICC Code, led by ICC Brazil; an early-stage exploration of a voluntary Responsible Advertising and Marketing Label, on which members rightly flagged liability and antitrust caveats; and progress on the ISO Technical Committee on Digital Marketing. Jeff Greenbaum closed with a tour of regulatory hot spots — ambush marketing around the World Cup, all-in and algorithmic pricing, and contested environmental claims. Next year marks the ICC Code’s 90th anniversary. Members are invited to help shape the celebrations — and, more importantly, to keep the Commission’s work the trusted reference it has long been.

< Back < Previous | Next > Enhancing Climate Finance in Emerging Markets 26 Jul 2025 Emerging markets and developing economies need US$450–550 billion in additional annual climate finance by 2030, but private flows are declining. ICC’s new policy brief shows how targeted reforms to the Basel III framework could unlock 3–4 times more private investment in climate-aligned projects. Ahead of COP30, ICC is calling for a structured dialogue with regulators to ensure climate finance flows to where it is most urgently needed. Emerging markets and developing economies (EMDEs) are central to achieving the Paris Agreement goals. They represent 25% of global GDP , yet attract just 14% of climate finance flows . Private finance to EMDEs is even more limited — only around US$30 billion annually , while the need is closer to US$450–550 billion each year by 2030 . A new ICC policy brief shows how reforms to the Basel III prudential framework could unlock significantly more private capital for climate-aligned projects in EMDEs. Current rules unintentionally discourage bank lending to these regions, despite strong data showing that project finance in EMDEs often outperforms corporate loans with lower-than-expected default rates and higher recovery rates. Key barriers identified: Limited recognition of risk mitigation tools : Guarantees and blended finance structures used by multilateral development banks (MDBs) and development finance institutions (DFIs) are often excluded from capital relief. Overly conservative treatment of project finance : Risk weights do not reflect proven performance and embedded protections. Country risk ceilings : Sovereign credit ratings inflate perceived risks, even for high-quality, co-financed projects, raising the cost of capital. The way forward ICC proposes a two-step approach : Technical clarifications – small adjustments to Basel rules that could immediately unlock more capital, such as recognising partial guarantees, timely payouts under MDB/DFI instruments, and borrower-level mitigants like FX hedging. Structural reforms – longer-term changes, including treating project finance as a distinct asset class, refining country risk treatment, and introducing a scaling factor for high-quality, climate-related EMDE investments (similar to the SME Supporting Factor in the EU). If implemented, these reforms could increase the bank capital available for climate projects in emerging markets by 3–4 times , without compromising financial stability. As the official voice of business in the UNFCCC process , ICC will take these recommendations into the COP30 negotiations in Belém, Brazil , calling for a structured dialogue with regulators and the Basel Committee to ensure climate finance reaches the regions that need it most. 2025-ICC-Enhancing-climate-finance-in-emerging-market-developing-economies-1 (2) .pdf Download PDF • 625KB

< Back < Previous | Next > Sustainability FfD4 Opens in Seville: A Crucial Test for Financing the SDGs 30 Jun 2025 At the FfD4 conference in Seville, the ICC called for practical, private sector-led financing to achieve the SDGs, urging action beyond symbolic commitments. With the “Compromiso de Sevilla” agreed, ICC is pushing for greater business input on SME investment, tax reform, and climate finance. With a hard-won outcome document and key stakeholders on the ground, ICC urges pragmatic financing solutions for sustainable development. The Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development (FfD4) officially opens today in Seville, Spain—marking a critical milestone for global efforts to mobilize resources to meet the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) by 2030. With time running short and public finances under pressure, the role of private sector-led solutions has never been more vital. ICC Secretary General John W.H. Denton AO, in a message to the ICC network last week, emphasized the importance of the Seville conference in restoring momentum behind multilateral cooperation and identifying practical financing tools to drive development forward. “FfD4 must be a moment to bring business fully to the table—not just as a source of capital, but as a partner for innovation, implementation, and inclusive growth,” he stated. The “Compromiso de Sevilla” Following intense negotiations, the conference opens with a draft outcome document already agreed—symbolically titled the Compromiso de Sevilla by its co-facilitators. The text was adopted by consensus earlier this month, despite the withdrawal of the United States from both the negotiations and the conference itself. While this consensus is being hailed as a sign of multilateralism’s enduring strength, it comes with important caveats. Several countries have registered reservations on key sections of the text, particularly those relating to debt sustainability. Others expressed disappointment that the final language fell short of stronger commitments on climate finance and in some cases merely preserved previously agreed provisions from the Paris Agreement and the UNFCCC. Nonetheless, the document is expected to be formally endorsed at FfD4 in Seville, and later adopted by the UN General Assembly—most likely through the existing FfD resolution via the Second Committee. Business Engagement: From Dialogue to Action ICC is playing a prominent role throughout the conference, particularly through its support to the International Business Forum , which will gather business leaders, development finance institutions, and policymakers to exchange concrete solutions. From blended finance and green bonds to innovative partnerships for SME inclusion, the Forum will explore ways to better align public and private finance with sustainable development priorities. In parallel, ICC members, national committees, and partners are contributing to a wide range of official side-events . These will tackle issues such as unlocking investment in emerging markets, enhancing financial inclusion, reforming international tax rules, and financing for climate adaptation. With the final outcome text largely settled, attention now turns to implementation. ICC’s engagement will focus on ensuring the Compromiso de Sevilla is more than symbolic—by pushing for action-oriented follow-up and greater private sector participation in shaping the financial architecture of the SDG decade. What to Watch Over the coming days, key sessions will focus on: Aligning global finance flows with the SDGs International tax cooperation and debt sustainability Scaling investment in sustainable infrastructure and SMEs Launch of the Seville Platform for Action Stay tuned for updates. ICC will be sharing key takeaways and developments from Seville throughout the week via our news and social media. Follow along as we help shape the global agenda for financing sustainable development.

< Back < Previous | Next > Global Response ICC warns trade uncertainty is undermining global business confidence 2 Jun 2025 Speaking live in an interview on Bloomberg’s Balance of Power show with hosts Kailey Leinz and Joe Mathieu, ICC Secretary General John W.H. Denton AO discussed current trade policy tensions and what it means for the international business community. Mr Denton said uncertainty surrounding US tariffs and trade policy is acting as a “tax” on international businesses. “What we’re seeing on a global basis is heightened levels of uncertainty,” He said, adding that the lack of clear direction on trade policy is shaking business confidence and disrupting global trade planning. Citing a recent Pulse survey of ICC’s global business network to assess the impact of newly announced US tariff measures, Mr Denton highlighted the growing challenges for small businesses. Conducted across 68 countries the survey shows that 77% of firms report direct or knock-on risks from the tariffs, and 48% say the measures have already impacted their supply chains or market strategy. “What that tells you is that small businesses are really feeling this as well, and they do not have the resources that large businesses do. It’s just problematic, and even for large business this is very complicated,” he said Mr Denton called for continued international cooperation citing ICC’s long-standing support for a multilateral rules-based trading system. “The reason we’ve been able to see a decline in poverty globally is because we actually have rules-based trading systems operating,” he said Watch the interview here .

< Back Stan Putter HBN Law Arbitrator Biography Stan Putter has over 15 years of experience in international arbitration. He primarily acts as counsel in international arbitration proceedings and ancillary litigation proceedings, including setting aside and enforcement actions, (ex parte) attachment proceedings, injunctions and evidence taking proceedings. He also sits as (chairman, co- and sole) arbitrator. He has been involved in around 100 arbitrations with seats and applicable laws across the globe. Stan Putter is the chairman of the Dutch Arbitration Association. Contact Details Netherlands +31 70 218 9400 Stan.Putter@hbnlawtax.com Additional Links Link About ICC Netherlands We ensure that Dutch business interests are heard and represented in international policymaking. We deliver tools and standards that simplify cross-border business like model contracts or Incoterms®. We support fair and efficient dispute resolution . Become a member Upcoming events Learn more Check our latest news! News Languages Spoken Dutch, English Specialisation Construction, Engineering, Energy, Finance, Corporate Law / M&A, Petrochemical, Technology Bar Admission(s) Credentials CV

< Back < Previous | Next > Geopolitics Navigating Uncertainty, Driving Solution 21 Mar 2025 Geopolitical tensions, trade barriers, and regulatory uncertainty continue to shape the international business landscape. Tariffs are increasing, supply chains are under pressure, and new EU regulations are redefining sustainability expectations. In this evolving environment, businesses must remain agile and proactive. At ICC, we see these challenges as a call to engage, not retreat. Whether through trade facilitation, arbitration, or sustainable trade finance, our mission is to help businesses navigate complexity and advocate for open markets. This was the key message of Philippe Varin, chair of the International Chamber of Commerce during his visit to the Netherlands last month. www.cityam.com International trade in the era of Trump 2.0 - how will the ICC adapt? Philippe Varin, chair of the International Chamber of Commerce, is stewarding the kind of globalist institution which Trump instinctively distrusts. He speaks to Eliot Wilson about championing free trade in an era of protectionism Key Themes This Month: Geopolitics & Trade Tensions : How will economic nationalism and tariffs impact global business? Read our interview with Bart Jan Koopman for insights into 2025 trade developments. Sustainability & Compliance : The EU Omnibus Proposal is redefining ESG reporting. Should businesses scale back compliance efforts or strengthen their sustainability strategies? The Future of Trade Rules : Despite regulatory uncertainty, progress is being made in trade digitalization. The long-overdue reform to recognize Digital Trade Documents in the Netherlands is finally moving forward Key Developments: • Trade finance is evolving to support sustainable supply chains. This month, Standard Chartered became the first international bank to fully align with ICC Principles for Sustainable Trade Finance, setting a precedent for greater transparency, due diligence, and accountability. More financial institutions are expected to follow. • Growing reliance on ICC dispute resolution – New 2024 figures show that businesses are turning to ICC arbitration and mediation more than ever, especially for B2G disputes. The 20th ICC International Commercial Mediation Competition also kicked off in Paris, highlighting the increasing role of mediation in resolving global business conflicts. Read our interview with Jeremy Lack on the evolving landscape of mediation. • ICC remains committed to free trade – As the G20 Presidency moves to South Africa, ICC sees new opportunities for international cooperation. John Denton, ICC-WBO Secretary General, emphasizes: “As the first African nation to hold the G20 Presidency, South Africa has a unique opportunity to build coalitions and revitalize the multilateral trading system.” Stay Engaged & Informed ICC Strategic Priorities 1. Tackling Trade Barriers 2. Promoting Access to Justice, Integrity, and Rule of Law 3. Advancing Climate Action and Sustainability 4. Accelerating Trade Digitalisation 5. Strengthening Multilateralism

Explore ICC's comprehensive business solutions designed to facilitate global trade. From ATA Carnets and Incoterms® to model contracts, certificates of origin, and digital trade tools, discover how ICC's standards and resources support businesses of all sizes and drive international commerce. How to seize global trade opportunities Discover the steps you can take to leverage global trade opportunities for your business and kick-start your global exports journey. Go to: Step 1: Identify global trade opportunities Step 2: Understand the basics of global trade Step 3: Showcase your products abroad Step 4: Leverage your IP assets Step 1: Identify global trade opportunities Are you ready to step into the world of global trade and see your products and services travel the globe? The first step in your trade journey is to explore commercial opportunities internationally. How to get started: Identify potential customers or suppliers in foreign markets Detect where demand for your goods and services will come from Check for any benefits from regional trade agreements Research tariffs and regulatory requirements Export Potential Map Spot products, markets and suppliers with export potential and opportunities for export diversification. View the map Global Trade Helpdesk Explore trade opportunities and access information about imports, market dynamics, tariffs, regulatory requirements, and potential buyers. Access the helpdesk Step 2: Understand the basics of global trade Trading goods and services across borders comes with its own set of rules and practices. Whether you are importing or exporting products – or looking to establish a commercial presence in a foreign market. Mastering key trade processes will give you a lasting competitive edge. How to get started: Discover the rules and standard practices of export-import trade Assess whether your product or service is suitable for export with the support of your local chamber of commerce Get trained and certified in export-import trade Guide to Export/Import Everything you need to know about rules and standard practices of export-import trade, customs requirements, contractual arrangements, financing trade and organising logistics. Order the guide Export/Import Certificate Learn the basics of doing business across borders with ICC’s international trade certification, offered by the ICC Academy. Register now Step 3: Showcase your products abroad Out of sight, out of mind. To secure visibility in foreign markets, successful exporters frequently showcase their products at trade fairs, exhibitions and roadshows with potential customers and distributors. This is a powerful means to build demand for your products and establish relationships with potential customers. How to get started: Research relevant industry conferences, exhibitions and trade fairs to attend Reserve your exhibiting space early Prepare to ship your products and promotional materials overseas ATA Carnet Avoid paying duties and taxes at customs when temporarily exporting and importing your products in over 80 countries/customs territories. Learn more Step 4: Leverage your IP assets Global trade offers both opportunities to leverage your intellectual property (IP) assets and grow your business, as well as specific IP risks that need to be properly measured and addressed. When operating internationally, IP is an important consideration in respect of your providers, licensors, customers and competitors. How to get started: Find out if your business has any IP assets Learn how your IP assets can be protected Understand how to manage your IP assets in a way that adds value to your business WIPO IP Diagnostics Identify your IP assets and receive recommendations on your IP and business competitiveness. Powered by the World Intellectual Property Organization in partnership with ICC Learn more Step 1 How to seize global trade opportunities Step 2 How to draft a contract Step 3 How to execute a business transaction Step 4 How to prevent and solve potential disputes in business Step 5 How to meet international ESG requirements Related pages How to draft a contract How to draft a contract How to execute a business transaction How to execute a business transaction How to prevent and solve potential disputes in business How to prevent and solve potential disputes in business

< Back < Previous | Next > Climate change ICC joins Business Call to Action to accelerate global cooperation for our oceans 10 Jun 2025 In a joint Business Call to Action more than 80 businesses and supporting organisations from 25 countries, including 55 businesses representing over €600 billion in turnover and 2 million employees, urged both private and public decisions-makers to strengthen global cooperation and accelerate action to conserve and sustainably use the ocean. As the largest business association in the world, the International Chamber of Commerce is proud to be a convener of this important call to action, bringing the voice of the global business community to the United Nations Ocean Conference. Download The call is convened by an unprecedented coalition of business networks, supported by signatories, including 80 businesses with a combined turnover of over €$600 billion and 2 million employees. In anticipation of the upcoming 2025 United Nations Ocean Conference in Nice, France,the call builds on the experience of leading businesses and organisations already advancing a sustainable blue economy. It emphasises the intrinsic connection between land and sea, highlighting the contribution and interdependencies between coastal and marine environment and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. This call is directed at all economic actors, whether directly or indirectly connected to the ocean, and includes: A call to action for businesses to expedite maintaining ocean health through business actions, such as contributions to ocean science, monitoring and reducing environmental impacts, incorporating ocean considerations into their climate and nature roadmaps and investing in blue solutions. A call to action for policy makers to pursue ambitious science-driven policies and measures that stimulate sustainable business action and to jointly address land and ocean for enhanced global resilience With this Business Call to Action, companies and business networks urge policymakers to: Agree to adopt and implement international agreements: champion strong, sustainable outcomes for existing and upcoming ocean-related agreements, Invest in ocean science and support strong science-policy interfaces, Acknowledge and embed into policies the links between ocean, nature and climate, Help all actors to collectively adapt to sea-level rise, Develop robust and innovative finance mechanisms, Raise awareness to encourage all actors to care for the ocean, even those based on land. This business declaration is still open to new signatories. For information on signing this declaration please contact: Daniel Grajales, Global Policy Manager - Environment daniel.grajales@iccwbo.org The Business Call to Action is convened by global and leading business networks including International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), United Nations Global Compact (UNGC), World Economic Forum (WEF), We Mean Business Coalition (WMB), Business for Nature (BfN), Mouvement des Entreprises de France (MEDEF), UN Global Compact Network France and Association française des Entreprises pour l’Environnement (EpE).

Discover the ICC Netherlands Arbitrator and ADR Database, a comprehensive resource connecting you with expert arbitrators and mediators. Explore profiles, qualifications, and find the right professional for your dispute resolution needs. ICC Netherlands Arbitrator & ADR Database Category Language Specialization Jurisdiction Marieke Witkamp Marieke Witkamp LLC Arbitrator Specialisation: Construction, Engineering, Arts,Leisure, Entertainment, Tourism, Sales, Purchases, Transport, Maritime, Pharmaceutical, Joint Ventures, Consortia, Cooperation, Insurance, Energy and Natural Resources, Distribution, Franchising, Corporate Law / M&A, Real Estate Languages: English, Dutch Bart Neervoort NEERVOORT Mediation Arbitrage (handelsnaam Nirwa Werk) Mediator Specialisation: Transport, Real Estate, Maritime, Joint Ventures, Insurance, Finance and Banking, Energy and Natural Resources, Distribution, Corporate Law / M&A, Consultancy Services (Other than Legal), Construction, Competition, Agency (Representation), Employment, Information and Communication Technologies, Sales, Pharmaceutical, Insolvency, Mass Claims, Personal Injury Languages: English, Dutch, French Irène Léger Staunch Arbitrator Specialisation: Corporate Law / M&A, Employment, Energy and Natural Resources Languages: English, French Bas Van Zelst Enhance Arbitration B.V. Arbitrator, Mediator Specialisation: Construction, Engineering, Distribution, Franchising, Investment / Public International Law, Corporate Law / M&A, Energy and Natural Resources Languages: English, Dutch Marc Krestin Fieldfisher Arbitrator Specialisation: Construction, Corporate Law / M&A, Finance and Banking, Information and Communication Technologies, Investment / Public International Law, Pharmaceutical, Sales, Sports, Transport, Environment, Agriculture, Distribution, Joint Ventures, Maritime, Real Estate, Renewable Energy, ESG, Retail, Technology/AI, Employment, Energy and Natural Resources Languages: German, English, Dutch, French Martje de Vries Lentsch De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek Arbitrator Specialisation: Joint Ventures, Energy, Commercial, Collaboration Agreements, Enforcement and Annulment of Arbitral Awards Languages: Dutch, English Manon Schonewille Proactive Mediators Mediator Specialisation: Consultancy Services (Other than Legal), Business Mediation, Employment Mediation Languages: Dutch, English, German Jeremy LACK LAWTECH Mediator Specialisation: Competition, Consultancy Services (Other than Legal), Corporate Law / M&A, Distribution, Information and Communication Technologies, Intellectual Property, Investment / Public International Law, Joint Ventures, Pharmaceutical, Sales, Sports, Arts, Employment, Energy and Natural Resources Languages: English, French, Spanish, Hebrew Marieke van Hooijdonk Independent Arbitrator Arbitrator Specialisation: Corporate Law / M&A, Investment / Public International Law, Financial Services, Biotech, Pharmaceutical, Technology, Media, Life Sciences and Healthcare Languages: Dutch, English 1 2 3 1 ... 1 2 3 ... 3

< Back < Previous | Next > Dispute Resolution Preventing Disputes Before They Arise: Strategic Tools in Investment and Commercial Arbitration Agata Zwolankiewicz, Yulia Levashova 6 May 2026 Preventing Disputes Before They Arise: Strategic Tools in Investment and Commercial Arbitration On 23 March 2026, during Paris Arbitration Week 2026, Dr. Yulia Levashova (Nyenrode Business University) organized a panel discussion “Preventing Disputes Before They Arise: Strategic Tools in Investment and Commercial Arbitration” at White&Case in Paris. The event brought together leading practitioners, academics, and institutional representatives to explore the growing importance of dispute prevention across both commercial and investment arbitration. The session opened with welcome remarks by Ms. Nataliia Tuzheliak (Associate, White&Case), who highlighted the historical roots of dispute prevention within arbitral practice and e mphasized its renewed relevance in today’s climate of geopolitical uncertainty. Dr. Yulia Levashova (Associate Professor, Nyenrode University) introduced the event, noting a persistent gap between the expanding toolkit for dispute prevention and its relatively limited use in practice – a theme that framed both panels. Panel I: Innovative Approaches to Dispute Prevention The first panel moderated by Dr. Yulia Levashova examined emerging tools and strategies designed to prevent disputes before escalation. A central focus was the evolving role of mediation. Ms. Agata Zwolankiewicz (Associate, Addleshaw Goddard / Researcher, KU Leuven) described investment mediation as an underutilized but increasingly recognized mechanism, supported by developments such as the Singapore Convention and new institutional frameworks. While unlikely to replace arbitration, mediation is gaining traction as a complementary tool, particularly for early–stage dispute resolution. Building on this, Mr. Marc Krestin (Partner, Fieldfisher) emphasized the importance of well-drafted multi-tier dispute resolution clauses. He noted that mediation clauses are generally enforceable across European jurisdictions when clearly formulated, and that effective clause design – ensuring structured engagement and clarity – can transform ADR mechanisms from procedural hurdles into genuine dispute prevention tools. From a construction perspective, Nataliia Tuzheliak highlighted the success of dispute adjudication boards (DABs). Drawing on empirical data, she noted that a significant majority of disputes are resolved at the DAB stage, with only a small fraction escalating to arbitration. The presence of technically qualified, standing adjudicators was identified as a key factor in fostering early resolution and maintaining project continuity. Turning to investment arbitration, Prof. Kamalia Mehtiyeva (Professor of Law at the University of Paris-Est Créteil (France), Arbitrator and Counsel) explored the emerging role of counterclaims as a potential dispute prevention mechanism. Although empirical evidence remains limited, she argued that the growing acceptance of counterclaims – particularly in treaty–based arbitration, may influence investor behaviour and encourage earlier settlements by recalibrating risk assessments. Institutional perspectives were provided by Dr. Hélène van Lith (Secretary to the ICC Commission on Arbitration & ADR, ICC Dispute Resolution Services and Associate Professor, University Paris Dauphine), who outlined the International Chamber of Commerce’s expanding suite of ADR services. She noted a clear trend towards combining mechanisms, such as mediation, expert determination, and dispute boards – in flexible, hybrid processes tailored to parties’ needs. Increased user awareness and demand for “dispute avoidance” tools were identified as key drivers of this shift. Panel II: Regional Perspectives on Dispute Prevention in Investment and Commercial Arbitration The second panel, moderated by Ms. Anna Guillard Sazhko (Independent Counsel and Arbitrator, Turkic Arbitration Association), examined how dispute prevention mechanisms are being developed and implemented across different regions, highlighting both common trends and jurisdiction – specific approaches. Focusing on Latin America, Mr. Eric Franco (Partner, Legal Delta) emphasized that most disagreements are in fact resolved amicably, and that effective dispute prevention requires keeping parties actively engaged and in control of their disputes, rather than delegating entirely to external counsel. He further highlighted that disputes stem from uncertainty, and can often be prevented through early clarification of risks and issues -particularly via tools such as risk management, proactive dispute boards, and fostering trust and open communication between the parties. Providing an institutional perspective from Kazakhstan, Mr. Christopher Campbell-Holt (Registrar and Chief Executive of the AIFC Court and IAC, AIFC Court and IAC) presented the model of the AIFC Court and IAC as an example of integrated dispute prevention and resolution. He highlighted how accessible procedures, proactive case management, and transparency contribute to building user trust. Addressing Central Asia more broadly, Dr. Saltanat Imanova (American University of Central Asia) outlined ongoing institutional innovations and a gradual shift toward formalized ADR frameworks aligned with international standards. She emphasized the importance of capacity building, legal education, and regional cooperation in strengthening dispute prevention practices. Finally, Ms. Diana Bayzakova (Director, Tashkent International Arbitration Centre) shared insights from Uzbekistan’s Tashkent International Arbitration Centre, highlighting recent legal reforms and institutional efforts aimed at improving the investment climate. She stressed that effective dispute prevention depends not only on modern legal frameworks but also on sustained governmental support and institutional credibility. The event concluded with reflections by Ms. Laure Jacquier (Director of ICC Netherlands), who underscored the importance of continued innovation and collaboration between practitioners, institutions, and states to ensure that dispute prevention becomes an integral part of arbitration practice.